KalshiOtherActive

Will Zohran Mamdani be Time Person of the Year in 2026?

27¢+270

last trade · closes 2027-01-01

Open on Kalshi (opens in a new tab)Compare across venues

24h volume$154.7K
Open interest$331.5K
Lifetime volume$726.0K

Odds history

Implied odds over timebid/askmidyesno37%28%18%Sep 20 06:57 UTCSep 21 21:58 UTC

How this market settles

Pays Yes when
If Zohran Mamdani is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.
When
Closes 2027-01-01.
Read the full rules Kalshi publishes

If Zohran Mamdani is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.

This will count towards the payout criterion: If multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. The person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. If Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes. This does NOT count towards the payout criterion: If there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. If “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person. This market and these products have not been endorsed by TIME. Any references to TIME, or any associated marks are descriptive only and do not indicate an endorsement of this product or any affiliation between TIME and Kalshi.

What this bet really costs you

  • On $100 at 27¢ you pay $5.11 in fees on Kalshi

    1.38¢ per contract · 370 contracts

  • On $100 at 27¢ you pay $4.38 in fees on Polymarket US

    1.18¢ per contract · 370 contracts

Exchange-side taker fees per each venue's published formula (rate × contracts × price × (1 − price)); contracts = stake ÷ price, rounded down to whole contracts. Fees peak at 50¢ and shrink toward the extremes. Most quoted cross-venue “arbs” are negative-EV after these fees; the taker-fee breakeven on a Kalshi/Polymarket pair is roughly 3.5–4¢.

Free Telegram alerts. Example:

Polymarket moved 8¢ on US recession in 2026? in the last 60 minutes (12¢ → 20¢). Kalshi hasn't caught up — still sitting at 14¢.

Get alerts (opens in a new tab)

Data: Kalshi id KXTIME-26-ZOH · ← All tracked markets